← Back to news← Back to articleDiscussions: lobste.rs22h30mArticle21 CommentsLisette — Rust syntax, Go runtimeAlllobste.rstrenchant16h45mI might actually be able to tolerate Go with this :-) I wonder how well it slots into an otherwise Go codebase? ssokolow15h10mJudging by the "Transparent" section of the page, probably about as well as TypeScript slots into a JavaScript codebase. (i.e. Probably pretty well) max-headroom16h35mThe exact variation I didn't want. jitl15h31mwhat's your complaint? say more masklinn14h27mYou wanted Go’s syntax on Rust’s runtime? white-star16h21mLooks like this one, perhaps a bit further along. https://github.com/borgo-lang/borgo If I were to use one of these, I’d like it to also accept lowercase function names. jitl15h33mborgo seems quite defunt though wrs13h30mI looked at this and a little voice said "it's the CoffeeScript of Go!" And to be clear I'm not immediately sure if that's good or bad. ph14nix8h9m Algebraic data types · Pattern matching • No nil · Hindley-Milner type system It's much more than just syntax. This is the sober way to write Go. vegai4h31mComment removed by authortrenchant16h45mI might actually be able to tolerate Go with this :-) I wonder how well it slots into an otherwise Go codebase? ssokolow15h10mJudging by the "Transparent" section of the page, probably about as well as TypeScript slots into a JavaScript codebase. (i.e. Probably pretty well) max-headroom16h35mThe exact variation I didn't want. jitl15h31mwhat's your complaint? say more masklinn14h27mYou wanted Go’s syntax on Rust’s runtime? white-star16h21mLooks like this one, perhaps a bit further along. https://github.com/borgo-lang/borgo If I were to use one of these, I’d like it to also accept lowercase function names. jitl15h33mborgo seems quite defunt though wrs13h30mI looked at this and a little voice said "it's the CoffeeScript of Go!" And to be clear I'm not immediately sure if that's good or bad. ph14nix8h9m Algebraic data types · Pattern matching • No nil · Hindley-Milner type system It's much more than just syntax. This is the sober way to write Go. vegai4h31mComment removed by author
I might actually be able to tolerate Go with this :-) I wonder how well it slots into an otherwise Go codebase?
Judging by the "Transparent" section of the page, probably about as well as TypeScript slots into a JavaScript codebase. (i.e. Probably pretty well)
The exact variation I didn't want.
what's your complaint? say more
You wanted Go’s syntax on Rust’s runtime?
Looks like this one, perhaps a bit further along.
https://github.com/borgo-lang/borgo
If I were to use one of these, I’d like it to also accept lowercase function names.
borgo seems quite defunt though
I looked at this and a little voice said "it's the CoffeeScript of Go!" And to be clear I'm not immediately sure if that's good or bad.
It's much more than just syntax. This is the sober way to write Go.
I might actually be able to tolerate Go with this :-) I wonder how well it slots into an otherwise Go codebase?
Judging by the "Transparent" section of the page, probably about as well as TypeScript slots into a JavaScript codebase. (i.e. Probably pretty well)
The exact variation I didn't want.
what's your complaint? say more
You wanted Go’s syntax on Rust’s runtime?
Looks like this one, perhaps a bit further along.
https://github.com/borgo-lang/borgo
If I were to use one of these, I’d like it to also accept lowercase function names.
borgo seems quite defunt though
I looked at this and a little voice said "it's the CoffeeScript of Go!" And to be clear I'm not immediately sure if that's good or bad.
It's much more than just syntax. This is the sober way to write Go.